The Handoff Problem: Why Work Disappears Between Teams

Work rarely fails inside a team — it fails between teams. Why handoffs lose context, ownership, and control.

X LinkedIn

The Handoff Problem: Why Work Disappears Between Teams

Most workflows do not fail inside a team.

They fail between teams.

A request is created. Someone does their part. Then work “moves” to the next group.

And that is where it disappears.

This pattern shows up in:

  • operations handoffs (frontline → back office)
  • support escalations (tier 1 → tier 2)
  • finance handoffs (requester → approver → AP)
  • revenue handoffs (SDR → AE → CS)

The handoff is not a step. It is a risk surface.


Pattern 1: The Handoff Has No Contract

Teams assume shared understanding.

But handoffs usually lack a clear contract for:

  • what “done” means for the upstream team
  • what data must be provided
  • what conditions must be true
  • what happens when information is missing

So downstream teams spend their time:

  • chasing context
  • redoing work
  • rejecting requests informally

The workflow slows down without anyone being accountable.


Pattern 2: Ownership Is Unclear at the Boundary

At the handoff boundary, people ask:

  • “Is this my job yet?”
  • “Who is responsible if this goes wrong?”

When ownership is unclear:

  • tasks sit unclaimed
  • follow-ups multiply
  • leaders intervene manually

The organization becomes dependent on hero behavior.


Pattern 3: Work Moves Through Side Channels

When the workflow is unclear, people route around it.

They use:

  • email
  • chat
  • spreadsheets
  • meetings

That creates two realities:

  • the system of record
  • the system people actually use

Once the workflow splits, reliability collapses.


Pattern 4: Exceptions Collapse Into the Handoff

Exceptions often get routed to “the next team” without classification.

Downstream teams receive:

  • incomplete requests
  • ambiguous edge cases
  • issues that need judgment

The handoff becomes the exception queue.

Over time, handoffs become the bottleneck.


What Reliable Organizations Do

They treat handoffs as first-class workflow steps.

That means:

  • define handoff requirements explicitly
  • attach required context automatically
  • validate inputs before the handoff completes
  • route exceptions intentionally
  • make ownership and SLAs visible
  • ensure the workflow remains the single source of truth

When handoffs become structured, throughput increases and friction drops.


How This Connects to RoboHen

RoboHen is built to make handoffs explicit:

  • workflow logic defines what must be true before work moves
  • human steps preserve accountability
  • exceptions follow defined paths
  • execution state remains visible across teams

Related pages

Ready to improve your Workflow?