The Handoff Problem: Why Work Disappears Between Teams
Work rarely fails inside a team — it fails between teams. Why handoffs lose context, ownership, and control.
The Handoff Problem: Why Work Disappears Between Teams
Most workflows do not fail inside a team.
They fail between teams.
A request is created. Someone does their part. Then work “moves” to the next group.
And that is where it disappears.
This pattern shows up in:
- operations handoffs (frontline → back office)
- support escalations (tier 1 → tier 2)
- finance handoffs (requester → approver → AP)
- revenue handoffs (SDR → AE → CS)
The handoff is not a step. It is a risk surface.
Pattern 1: The Handoff Has No Contract
Teams assume shared understanding.
But handoffs usually lack a clear contract for:
- what “done” means for the upstream team
- what data must be provided
- what conditions must be true
- what happens when information is missing
So downstream teams spend their time:
- chasing context
- redoing work
- rejecting requests informally
The workflow slows down without anyone being accountable.
Pattern 2: Ownership Is Unclear at the Boundary
At the handoff boundary, people ask:
- “Is this my job yet?”
- “Who is responsible if this goes wrong?”
When ownership is unclear:
- tasks sit unclaimed
- follow-ups multiply
- leaders intervene manually
The organization becomes dependent on hero behavior.
Pattern 3: Work Moves Through Side Channels
When the workflow is unclear, people route around it.
They use:
- chat
- spreadsheets
- meetings
That creates two realities:
- the system of record
- the system people actually use
Once the workflow splits, reliability collapses.
Pattern 4: Exceptions Collapse Into the Handoff
Exceptions often get routed to “the next team” without classification.
Downstream teams receive:
- incomplete requests
- ambiguous edge cases
- issues that need judgment
The handoff becomes the exception queue.
Over time, handoffs become the bottleneck.
What Reliable Organizations Do
They treat handoffs as first-class workflow steps.
That means:
- define handoff requirements explicitly
- attach required context automatically
- validate inputs before the handoff completes
- route exceptions intentionally
- make ownership and SLAs visible
- ensure the workflow remains the single source of truth
When handoffs become structured, throughput increases and friction drops.
How This Connects to RoboHen
RoboHen is built to make handoffs explicit:
- workflow logic defines what must be true before work moves
- human steps preserve accountability
- exceptions follow defined paths
- execution state remains visible across teams
Related pages
- Operations Automation
- Sales Operations Automation More perspectives
- Insights